1968 Jaguar E Type vs. 2012 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2012 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar E Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar E Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar E Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Wrangler (285 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1968 Jaguar E Type. (226 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1968 Jaguar E Type. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 557 kg more than 1968 Jaguar E Type. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Jaguar E Type. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Jaguar E Type | 2012 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
| Model | E Type | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 226 HP | 285 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1957 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4404 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1877 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2946 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 85 L |
