1968 Jaguar Type S vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar Type S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar Type S would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar Type S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Jaguar Type S (208 HP) has 99 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Jaguar Type S should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1968 Jaguar Type S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Jaguar Type S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Jaguar Type S | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Jaguar | Ford |
Model | Type S | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2490 mm |