1968 Jaguar Type S vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar Type S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar Type S would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar Type S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1968 Jaguar Type S. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1968 Jaguar Type S.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Jaguar Type S (300 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 1968 Jaguar Type S will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Jaguar Type S | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Jaguar | Holden |
| Model | Type S | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3442 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.1 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
