1968 Jaguar XJ-13 vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar XJ-13. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 would be higher. At 4,990 cc (12 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 485 kg more than 1968 Jaguar XJ-13.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Jaguar XJ-13. (570 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Jaguar XJ-13.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
| Model | XJ-13 | Celica |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4990 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 622 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1000 mm | 1280 mm |
