1968 Jaguar XJ-13 vs. 2002 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2002 Volvo XC90 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar XJ-13. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 would be higher. At 4,990 cc (12 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 326 kg more than 1968 Jaguar XJ-13.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 (570 Nm @ 6300 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Volvo XC90. (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Volvo XC90.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 | 2002 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
| Model | XJ-13 | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4990 cc | 2519 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 6300 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1000 mm | 1790 mm |
