1968 Jaguar XJ-13 vs. 2003 Volvo C70
To start off, 2003 Volvo C70 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar XJ-13. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 would be higher. At 4,990 cc (12 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo C70 weights approximately 440 kg more than 1968 Jaguar XJ-13.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 (570 Nm @ 6300 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Volvo C70. (320 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Jaguar XJ-13 | 2003 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | XJ-13 | C70 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4990 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 241 HP |
Torque | 570 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6300 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1565 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1000 mm | 1430 mm |