1968 Jaguar XJ-13 vs. 2009 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar XJ-13. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 would be higher. At 4,990 cc (12 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 (570 Nm @ 6300 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Jaguar XF. (560 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Jaguar XF.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 | 2009 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
| Model | XJ-13 | XF |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4990 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 420 HP |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 560 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1000 mm | 1470 mm |
