1968 Jaguar XJ-13 vs. 2010 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford C-Max is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar XJ-13. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 would be higher. At 4,990 cc (12 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford C-Max weights approximately 250 kg more than 1968 Jaguar XJ-13.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 (570 Nm @ 6300 RPM) has 340 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford C-Max. (230 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford C-Max.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 | 2010 Ford C-Max | |
| Make | Jaguar | Ford |
| Model | XJ-13 | C-Max |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4990 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 95 HP |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 6300 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1375 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1828 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1000 mm | 1626 mm |
