1968 Jaguar XJ-13 vs. 2010 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Equator is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar XJ-13. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 would be higher. At 4,990 cc (12 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 weights approximately 60 kg more than 2010 Suzuki Equator.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 (570 Nm @ 6300 RPM) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Suzuki Equator. (381 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Suzuki Equator.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 | 2010 Suzuki Equator | |
| Make | Jaguar | Suzuki |
| Model | XJ-13 | Equator |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4990 cc | 3954 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 262 HP |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 381 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1065 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1000 mm | 1790 mm |
