1968 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 2002 Toyota ES 3
To start off, 2002 Toyota ES 3 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jaguar XJ6 weights approximately 980 kg more than 2002 Toyota ES 3.
Because 1968 Jaguar XJ6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Jaguar XJ6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota ES 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Jaguar XJ6 | 2002 Toyota ES 3 | |
Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
Model | XJ6 | ES 3 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2320 mm |