1968 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 2005 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2005 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Jaguar XJ6 (245 HP) has 96 more horse power than 2005 Saab 03-Sep. (149 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 2005 Saab 03-Sep.
Because 1968 Jaguar XJ6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Jaguar XJ6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saab 03-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Jaguar XJ6 (385 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Saab 03-Sep. (315 Nm). This means 1968 Jaguar XJ6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Saab 03-Sep.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Jaguar XJ6 | 2005 Saab 03-Sep | |
Make | Jaguar | Saab |
Model | XJ6 | 03-Sep |
Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 1910 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 149 HP |
Torque | 385 Nm | 315 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92.1 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 90.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1760 mm |