1968 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 2005 Toyota Opa
To start off, 2005 Toyota Opa is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jaguar XJ6 weights approximately 480 kg more than 2005 Toyota Opa.
Because 2005 Toyota Opa is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Jaguar XJ6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Opa will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Jaguar XJ6 | 2005 Toyota Opa | |
| Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
| Model | XJ6 | Opa |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 245 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
