1968 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1993 Lada Samara
To start off, 1993 Lada Samara is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Lada Samara (64 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1968 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Lada Samara should accelerate faster than 1968 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 110 kg more than 1993 Lada Samara.
Because 1968 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Lada Samara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Lada Samara. (98 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1968 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Lada Samara.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Jeep CJ5 | 1993 Lada Samara | |
Make | Jeep | Lada |
Model | CJ5 | Samara |
Year Released | 1968 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1288 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 64 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 98 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2470 mm |