1968 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1997 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1997 Mazda Midge is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mazda Midge (67 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1968 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 1968 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 64 kg more than 1997 Mazda Midge.
Because 1968 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Mazda Midge. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1968 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Jeep CJ5 | 1997 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | CJ5 | Midge |
Year Released | 1968 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1322 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1400 mm |