1968 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2003 Volkswagen Passat

To start off, 2003 Volkswagen Passat is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Volkswagen Passat is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volkswagen Passat (270 HP) has 211 more horse power than 1968 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volkswagen Passat should accelerate faster than 1968 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volkswagen Passat weights approximately 518 kg more than 1968 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Volkswagen Passat (370 Nm) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm). This means 2003 Volkswagen Passat will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Jeep CJ5. 2003 Volkswagen Passat has automatic transmission and 1968 Jeep CJ5 has manual transmission. 1968 Jeep CJ5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Volkswagen Passat will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: