1968 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (139 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1968 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1968 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 220 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 1968 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 3 (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Jeep CJ5 | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | CJ5 | 3 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 139 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 182 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2650 mm |