1968 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2007 Lotus Exige
To start off, 2007 Lotus Exige is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Lotus Exige (189 HP) has 130 more horse power than 1968 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Lotus Exige should accelerate faster than 1968 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 114 kg more than 2007 Lotus Exige.
Because 1968 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Lotus Exige. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Lotus Exige (180 Nm @ 6800 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2007 Lotus Exige will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Jeep CJ5 | 2007 Lotus Exige | |
Make | Jeep | Lotus |
Model | CJ5 | Exige |
Year Released | 1968 | 2007 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 189 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 916 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2310 mm |