1968 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2007 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2007 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP) has 173 more horse power than 1968 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1968 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1968 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda RX-8 (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Jeep CJ5 | 2007 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | CJ5 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2007 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1306 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 232 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2710 mm |