1968 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (104 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1968 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1968 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 75 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 1968 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 145 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Jeep CJ5 | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | CJ5 | 6 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 104 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 955 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2610 mm |
