1968 Jensen FF vs. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jensen FF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jensen FF would be higher. At 6,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Jensen FF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover (311 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1968 Jensen FF. (279 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1968 Jensen FF.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover (700 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Jensen FF. (587 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2012 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Jensen FF.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Jensen FF | 2012 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Jensen | Land Rover |
Model | FF | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6276 cc | 4367 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 279 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 587 Nm | 700 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4973 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2891 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 104 L |