1968 Lincoln Continental vs. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,536 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 890 kg more than 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1968 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Lincoln Continental | 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Lincoln | Oldsmobile |
Model | Continental | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1968 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7536 cc | 2259 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 209 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2210 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2680 mm |