1968 Lincoln Continental vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 1996 Acura TL is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,536 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lincoln Continental (209 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1996 Acura TL. (176 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1996 Acura TL.
Because 1968 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Lincoln Continental | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Lincoln | Acura |
Model | Continental | TL |
Year Released | 1968 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7536 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 209 HP | 176 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2840 mm |