1968 Lotus 49 vs. 1953 Rover P4
To start off, 1968 Lotus 49 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Lotus 49 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus 49 (405 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 312 more horse power than 1953 Rover P4. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus 49 should accelerate faster than 1953 Rover P4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Rover P4 weights approximately 970 kg more than 1968 Lotus 49.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Lotus 49 | 1953 Rover P4 | |
| Make | Lotus | Rover |
| Model | 49 | P4 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1953 |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 2638 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 405 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 516 kg | 1486 kg |
