1968 Lotus 49 vs. 1964 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 1968 Lotus 49 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,993 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Lotus 49 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus 49 (405 HP) has 297 more horse power than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus 49 should accelerate faster than 1964 Reliant Sabre Six. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Reliant Sabre Six weights approximately 281 kg more than 1968 Lotus 49.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Lotus 49 | 1964 Reliant Sabre Six | |
| Make | Lotus | Reliant |
| Model | 49 | Sabre Six |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 2552 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 405 HP | 108 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 516 kg | 797 kg |
