1968 Lotus 49 vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus 49. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus 49 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Lotus 49 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus 49 (405 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 6. (256 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus 49 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 514 kg more than 1968 Lotus 49.
Because 2004 Mazda 6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Lotus 49. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Lotus 49 | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Lotus | Mazda |
| Model | 49 | 6 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 2261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 405 HP | 256 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 516 kg | 1030 kg |
