1968 Lotus Elan vs. 1955 Mercedes-Benz 190
To start off, 1968 Lotus Elan is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Mercedes-Benz 190. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Mercedes-Benz 190 would be higher. At 1,897 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Mercedes-Benz 190 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Mercedes-Benz 190 (120 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Mercedes-Benz 190 should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Mercedes-Benz 190 weights approximately 772 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Lotus Elan | 1955 Mercedes-Benz 190 | |
| Make | Lotus | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Elan | 190 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1897 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 430 kg | 1202 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 100 L |
