1968 Lotus Elan vs. 1969 Seat 600
To start off, 1969 Seat 600 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1969 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1969 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Lotus Elan weights approximately 245 kg more than 1969 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Lotus Elan | 1969 Seat 600 | |
Make | Lotus | Seat |
Model | Elan | 600 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 767 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2010 mm |