1968 Lotus Elan vs. 1982 Renault 5
To start off, 1982 Renault 5 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Renault 5 (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Renault 5 should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Renault 5 weights approximately 540 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Lotus Elan | 1982 Renault 5 | |
Make | Lotus | Renault |
Model | Elan | 5 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 430 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 51 L |