1968 Lotus Elan vs. 1983 Mini MK IV
To start off, 1983 Mini MK IV is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1983 Mini MK IV. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1983 Mini MK IV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Lotus Elan weights approximately 210 kg more than 1983 Mini MK IV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Mini MK IV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Lotus Elan | 1983 Mini MK IV | |
Make | Lotus | Mini |
Model | Elan | MK IV |
Year Released | 1968 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 847 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2040 mm |