1968 Lotus Elan vs. 1991 Acura Integra
To start off, 1991 Acura Integra is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Acura Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Acura Integra (138 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan.
Because 1968 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Lotus Elan | 1991 Acura Integra | |
| Make | Lotus | Acura |
| Model | Elan | Integra |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1991 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.7 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1330 mm |
