1968 Lotus Elan vs. 1995 McLaren F1 LM
To start off, 1995 McLaren F1 LM is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 6,063 cc (12 cylinders), 1995 McLaren F1 LM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 McLaren F1 LM (660 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 552 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 McLaren F1 LM should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 McLaren F1 LM weights approximately 360 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Lotus Elan | 1995 McLaren F1 LM | |
Make | Lotus | McLaren |
Model | Elan | F1 LM |
Year Released | 1968 | 1995 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 6063 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 660 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 702 kg | 1062 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1130 mm |