1968 Lotus Elan vs. 1995 Peugeot 106
To start off, 1995 Peugeot 106 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1995 Peugeot 106. (100 HP @ 7200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1995 Peugeot 106. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Peugeot 106 weights approximately 380 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan.
Because 1968 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Peugeot 106, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Lotus Elan | 1995 Peugeot 106 | |
Make | Lotus | Peugeot |
Model | Elan | 106 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1292 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 430 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 3570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 45 L |