1968 Lotus Elan vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Renault Clio weights approximately 85 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan.
Because 1968 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Lotus Elan | 2000 Renault Clio | |
Make | Lotus | Renault |
Model | Elan | Clio |
Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 50 L |