1968 Lotus Elan vs. 2004 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2004 Mazda AZ is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda AZ weights approximately 48 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan.
Because 2004 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Mazda AZ has automatic transmission and 1968 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1968 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Mazda AZ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Lotus Elan | 2004 Mazda AZ | |
| Make | Lotus | Mazda |
| Model | Elan | AZ |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1558 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 702 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1700 mm |
