1968 Lotus Elan vs. 2004 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2004 Renault Kangoo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Renault Kangoo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2004 Renault Kangoo. (100 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Kangoo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Kangoo weights approximately 870 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan.
Because 2004 Renault Kangoo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Kangoo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Lotus Elan | 2004 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Lotus | Renault |
Model | Elan | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 430 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 50 L |