1968 Lotus Elan vs. 2005 Mazda B2500
To start off, 2005 Mazda B2500 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 4,030 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda B2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda B2500 (204 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda B2500 should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B2500 weights approximately 1275 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Lotus Elan | 2005 Mazda B2500 | |
| Make | Lotus | Mazda |
| Model | Elan | B2500 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1558 cc | 4030 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 204 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 430 kg | 1705 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 5010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2990 mm |
