1968 Lotus Elan vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,957 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (252 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 980 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Lotus Elan | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Lotus | Renault |
Model | Elan | Clio |
Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 2957 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 7150 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 430 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 60 L |