1968 Lotus Elan vs. 2010 BMW 128
To start off, 2010 BMW 128 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 BMW 128 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW 128 (230 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW 128 should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW 128 weights approximately 1155 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Lotus Elan | 2010 BMW 128 | |
| Make | Lotus | BMW |
| Model | Elan | 128 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1558 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 230 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 430 kg | 1585 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4361 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1748 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1412 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2659 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 53 L |
