1968 Lotus Elan vs. 2010 Hummer H3
To start off, 2010 Hummer H3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 3,700 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Hummer H3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Hummer H3 (239 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Hummer H3 should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Hummer H3 weights approximately 1374 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Hummer H3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Hummer H3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Lotus Elan | 2010 Hummer H3 | |
Make | Lotus | Hummer |
Model | Elan | H3 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 239 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 2194 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3420 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 102 L |