1968 Lotus Elan vs. 2012 Dodge Journey
To start off, 2012 Dodge Journey is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Journey is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Journey (283 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Journey should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan.
Because 2012 Dodge Journey is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Journey will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Dodge Journey has automatic transmission and 1968 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1968 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Dodge Journey will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Lotus Elan | 2012 Dodge Journey | |
Make | Lotus | Dodge |
Model | Elan | Journey |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 283 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6350 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4887 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1834 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1765 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2891 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 78 L |