1968 Lotus Elan vs. 2013 Chevrolet Silverado
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Silverado is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 5,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Silverado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Silverado (327 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Silverado should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Silverado weights approximately 2103 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Lotus Elan | 2013 Chevrolet Silverado | |
Make | Lotus | Chevrolet |
Model | Elan | Silverado |
Year Released | 1968 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 5999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 327 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 430 kg | 2533 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 5847 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1875 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 3645 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 98 L |