1968 Lotus Elan vs. 2013 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2013 Nissan Juke is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Juke is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Juke (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Juke should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Juke weights approximately 1000 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Nissan Juke is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Juke will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Lotus Elan | 2013 Nissan Juke | |
Make | Lotus | Nissan |
Model | Elan | Juke |
Year Released | 1968 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 430 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 45 L |