1968 Lotus Seven vs. 1996 Proton 300
To start off, 1996 Proton 300 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Proton 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Proton 300 weights approximately 565 kg more than 1968 Lotus Seven.
Because 1968 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Proton 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Lotus Seven | 1996 Proton 300 | |
Make | Lotus | Proton |
Model | Seven | 300 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 550 kg | 1115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3380 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2450 mm |