1968 Lotus Seven vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 70 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Seven. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Seven.
Because 1968 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Lotus Seven | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Lotus | Holden |
Model | Seven | Epica |
Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 153 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3380 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 950 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2700 mm |