1968 Marcos 1600 vs. 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace
To start off, 1968 Marcos 1600 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Marcos 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Marcos 1600 (88 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. (72 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Marcos 1600 should accelerate faster than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Marcos 1600 weights approximately 342 kg more than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Marcos 1600 | 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace | |
Make | Marcos | Simca |
Model | 1600 | Type 11 Monoplace |
Year Released | 1968 | 1949 |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1220 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2250 mm |