1968 Marcos 1600 vs. 1997 Acura CL

To start off, 1997 Acura CL is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Marcos 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Marcos 1600 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura CL (200 HP) has 112 more horse power than 1968 Marcos 1600. (88 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1968 Marcos 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Acura CL weights approximately 818 kg more than 1968 Marcos 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1968 Marcos 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Marcos 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Acura CL has automatic transmission and 1968 Marcos 1600 has manual transmission. 1968 Marcos 1600 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Acura CL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: