1968 Marcos 1600 vs. 2002 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2002 Mini Cooper is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Marcos 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Marcos 1600 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mini Cooper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mini Cooper (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1968 Marcos 1600. (88 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mini Cooper should accelerate faster than 1968 Marcos 1600.
Because 1968 Marcos 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Marcos 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mini Cooper (210 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Marcos 1600. (130 Nm). This means 2002 Mini Cooper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Marcos 1600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Marcos 1600 | 2002 Mini Cooper | |
| Make | Marcos | Mini |
| Model | 1600 | Cooper |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 88 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 130 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Top Speed | 175 km/hour | 218 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 3660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1070 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2470 mm |
