1968 Marcos 1600 vs. 2002 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2002 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Marcos 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Marcos 1600 would be higher. At 3,274 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Nissan Pathfinder is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Marcos 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Pathfinder will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Nissan Pathfinder has automatic transmission and 1968 Marcos 1600 has manual transmission. 1968 Marcos 1600 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Nissan Pathfinder will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Marcos 1600 | 2002 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Marcos | Nissan |
Model | 1600 | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 1968 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 3274 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1070 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2710 mm |