1968 Marcos 1600 vs. 2004 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2004 Nissan Frontier is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Marcos 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Marcos 1600 would be higher. At 3,278 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Frontier (210 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1968 Marcos 1600. (88 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 1968 Marcos 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Frontier weights approximately 1069 kg more than 1968 Marcos 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Frontier (334 Nm) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Marcos 1600. (130 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Frontier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Marcos 1600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Marcos 1600 | 2004 Nissan Frontier | |
| Make | Marcos | Nissan |
| Model | 1600 | Frontier |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 3278 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 88 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 130 Nm | 334 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 91.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77.6 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.9:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 1831 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 5540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1070 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 3340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 73 L |
