1968 Mazda 1000 vs. 1977 Renault 20
To start off, 1977 Renault 20 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda 1000 would be higher. At 2,067 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Renault 20 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Renault 20 weights approximately 525 kg more than 1968 Mazda 1000.
Because 1968 Mazda 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Renault 20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mazda 1000 | 1977 Renault 20 | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 1000 | 20 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1168 cc | 2067 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 735 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2670 mm |